Epistemic ideal

I’ve been talking about building and by the way for law enforcement purposes it was kind of how I first conceived it a temporal timespace modeling system. Among its features would be to find anomalous conditions prior to an event. That would be done after the event. And try to find out who had a precognitive awareness of the event before it occurred. The epistemic ideal relates to this. And actions are mirror by truth or statements about the actions. It is a belief of police officers that if they don’t identify the racks they are not guilty of them. The epistemic ideal is part of this it’s attempting to find an explanation for behaviors which have not been explained in particular not been explained by those committing the illegal acts. The epistemic ideal can be considered in this form a suspect has been taken into custody because of their actions. At this point in the reflection of the individual you do not have a confession and that she don’t have an epistemic reality of guilt. That is the ideal of the the idea of whether they’re guilty or not I deal theory is a representation of something that exists. In this particular case guilt it may be the behavior is guilty. But in terms of the description of the event you don’t have the confession matching the behavior. If it did you have the confession of what the behavior was along with the behavior then the epidemic the epistemic ideal is consistent. The police attacks upon me are clearly to stop the book which is about the police. They will not to admit to that but it is true and that is why my life is in danger I’m writing a book about them.