Theory 1 The Deaths of Clark Gable and Marylin Monroe
Marilyn Monroe died of a barbiturate overdose late in the evening of Saturday, August 4, 1962, at her 12305 Fifth Helena Drive home in Los Angeles, California. She was 36 years old. Her body was discovered before dawn on Sunday, August 5. She was one of the most popular Hollywood stars during the 1950s and early 1960s, was considered a major sex symbol at the time, and was a top-billed actress for a decade. Monroe’s films had grossed $200 million by the time of her death.[1]
William Clark Gable was an American film actor, often referred to as “The King of Hollywood”. He had roles in more than 60 motion pictures in multiple genres during a career that lasted 37 years, three decades of which was as a leading man. Wikipedia
Born: February 1, 1901, Cadiz, OH
Died: November 16, 1960, Hollywood Presbyterian
The Misfits is a 1961 American Western film written by Arthur Miller, directed by John Huston, and starring Clark Gable, Marilyn Monroe, and Montgomery Clift. The supporting cast features Thelma Ritter, Eli Wallach, and Kevin McCarthy. Adapted by Miller from his own short story of the same name published in Esquire in October 1957,[3]The Misfits was the last completed film for both Clark Gable and Marilyn Monroe. For Gable, the film was posthumously released, and Marilyn Monroe died in August 1962. The plot centers on a newly divorced woman, Roslyn Tabor, (Monroe) and her time in Reno and Northern Nevada, spent with her friendly Reno landlady Isabelle Steers (Thelma Ritter), an old-school cowboy (Gable), the cowboy’s tow truck-driving and plane-flying best friend (Wallach) and their rodeo-riding, bronc-busting friend (Clift) in Dayton, Nevada, and in the western Nevada desert, in 1960. Roslyn has been in Reno for her six-week Nevada residency, living with Isabelle Steers, for her divorce from her husband, Raymond Tabor. (Kevin McCarthy)
John Marcellus Huston (/ˈhjuːstən/ (listen) HEW-stən; August 5, 1906 – August 28, 1987) was an American film director, screenwriter, actor and visual artist. He wrote the screenplays for most of the 37 feature films he directed, many of which are today considered classics, including The Maltese Falcon (1941), The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948), The Asphalt Jungle (1950), The African Queen (1951), The Misfits (1961), Fat City (1972), The Man Who Would Be King (1975) and Prizzi’s Honor (1985). During his 46-year career, Huston received 15 Academy Award nominations, winning twice. He also directed both his father, Walter Huston, and daughter, Anjelica Huston, to Oscar wins.
The Man Who WOuld BE King was a person a Free Mason whose Eye of Providence was a shield viewed by the primitives as giving Godlike powers. IN fact they person was not God as percieved by British Free Masons.
My theory is that The Misfits may be some Ghostwritten CIA propoganda that like Jet Pilot the FBI CIA used to tell of FOXP2 types livinv in the USA sort of a cult of their own studing ADHD Dyslexia Free Spirit types.
Under Nixon Rockefeller Psychiatry this is well understood. Monroe was in Seatle but secretly.
I think she and Glorian DOnegan were sisters rescued by RKO person Joseph Kennedy Sr in 1926 and Monroe has been compared facially with Queen Eliizibeth II,
If they were killed to keep the plot from going public during JFK admin, then keeping the killing of Monroe, Gable, then Malcom X JFK RFK Ted Gunderson secret is a must.
10/30/22, 1:09 PM Masonic Imagery in The Man Who Would Be King: [Essay Example], 3408 words GradesFixer
https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/masonic-imagery-in-the-man-who-would-be-king/ 1/7
Masonic Imagery in The Man Who Would Be King
Rudyard Kipling begins The Man Who Would Be King by quoting a phrase commonly
associated with the Masonic Order; the story itself contains many Masonic references
including the degrees, the forms of recognition, the overall Lodge hierarchy, and certain
aspects of the initiatory process. But Freemasonry, which is sometimes known as the
Craft, consists of not just the formal elements but also the shared knowledge, culture,
and traditions observed by all Masons. These aspects of Masonic subculture, and the fact
that the narrator and the two main characters are Freemasons, are vital to the plot of the
story. This essay will provide background information for the Masonic terminology and
imagery used in The Man Who Would Be King so as to provide sufficient context to allow
a reader of the novella to understand the subtext. Yet the essay does not purport to
probe any of the deeper meanings of Masonic symbols, to endorse or condemn
Freemasonry, or to reveal information restricted to initiates. Nor does it provide any
information about the Craft beyond what is necessary to understand Kipling’s story.
In The Man Who Would Be King, the two main characters Daniel Dravot and Peachey
Carnahan travel to Kafiristan, a fictionalized version of a part of northeastern
Afghanistan once known by that name, and presently called Nuristan. Their goal is to
make themselves kings of that territory. One of the ways they do that is by passing
themselves off as having mystical powers in addition to their firearms. They find
evidence that Freemasonry has been introduced to the local men in the distant past,
but only up to the Second Degree. It has since fallen out of regular use and mutated into
an almost cult-like practice. Dan and Peachey impress the local men with their
knowledge of Masonry by displaying knowledge that, in Kafiristan, is considered to be
not just specific to a higher degree, but proof that they are actual gods. Instead of
correcting the misunderstanding, Dan and Peachey willingly use the Craft to
consolidate their power, until one day Dan takes his arrogance too far and is revealed to
be just a mortal man. The Kafirs immediately rebel, and only Peachey returns alive to tell
the tale. To a person not familiar with Masonic culture or traditions, Kipling’s story is a
swashbuckling adventure novel. However, from a Masonic perspective, it is a morality
tale with a very predictable denouement.
The Masonic Order is an all-male fraternal organization established in the early 18th
century but based on traditions from even older secret societies that may possibly
include medieval trade guilds and the Knights Templar. In its present form, Masonry has
a tiered initiation system wherein men pass through three degrees one at a time, with
each degree of conferring additional knowledge and responsibility. A man may request
10/30/22, 1:09 PM Masonic Imagery in The Man Who Would Be King: [Essay Example], 3408 words GradesFixer
https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/masonic-imagery-in-the-man-who-would-be-king/ 2/7
admission, but he must be sponsored by a reputable Mason of the Lodge to which he
seeks admission, so that the members of the Lodge may vote on whether to accept him.
If he is accepted, his sponsor is held partially accountable for his future conduct, and he
is initiated into the First Degree by means of a special ritual. The First Degree is followed
by the Second or Fellow Craft Degree ritual, at which point he may be “raised” to the
Third or Master Mason Degree, which is also a separate ritual.
There are a few ways by which one Mason can recognize another of his own degree or
lower. These forms of recognition are secret, and one of the oaths a Freemason takes
during each degree ceremony is to never reveal them to outsiders. They are given out
during the degree ceremony and must be memorized, and before any Mason is allowed
to see or hear any activity related to a specific degree he must prove himself by using
these means of recognition. Kipling’s story mentions two forms of recognition: the
degree grips, and the degree words.
Grips can be considered as secret handshakes. They are discreet enough to be done in
public between two Masons who will appear to simply be shaking hands. But they are
unique enough to not occur by accident, and each grip also has a response so that the
man giving the Grip can determine whether the other is responding correctly. Each
degree has a unique grip. When Peachey shakes hands with Billy Fish and receives the
Grip, he recognizes Billy as a Mason of at least the First Degree. Peachey tries the Fellow
Craft grip and Billy responds correctly, proving himself to be a Mason of at least the
Second Degree. But when Peachey tries the Master Grip of the Third Degree, he gets no
response. Accordingly, Peachey identifies Billy as potentially being a Fellow Craft Mason.
So he asks of Dan: “does he know the Word?”
The Word Peachey is asking about is another form of recognition. Each degree has a
unique word that, like the Grip, is secret. These words are not language specific, but
common throughout the world to all Masons of that degree. Dan asserts that Billy
knows the Words of the First and Second Degrees, as do all the priests. Dan has seen
“marks” or symbols carved on the some rocks that correspond to some symbols
associated with First and Second Degree Masons, and tells Peachey that the local chiefs
and priests can conduct a Fellow Craft Lodge ceremony “in a way that’s very like ours.”
The phrase “in a way that’s very like ours” is a sign that Dan and Peachey are in trouble.
They have stumbled upon people who appear to be Freemasons and who have some of
the forms of recognition, but who are not actually part of a regular or recognized Lodge.
Although they know and observe the superficial parts of Masonry, they are not
necessarily aware of the significance of the words, symbols, and rituals they use. Nor are
they necessarily bound by the same oaths or obligations as Peachey and Dan. Indeed,
Masonry the way it is practiced in Kafiristan operates more like a religious cult. To the
local “Masons”, the fact Dan and Peachey possess knowledge of the Third Degree is not
evidence that they have advanced farther in the Craft (as it would be in any regular
10/30/22, 1:09 PM Masonic Imagery in The Man Who Would Be King: [Essay Example], 3408 words GradesFixer
https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/masonic-imagery-in-the-man-who-would-be-king/ 3/7
lodge), but that they are gods. Since Dan has been trying to pass himself and Peachey
off as gods since they entered Kafiristan in order to get the local people to submit to his
rulership, the coincidence appears to be a lucky break. In reality it is a pitfall.
The Masonic Order is a global body with members all over the world, but it has a
somewhat hierarchical structure. The core unit of organization is the “Lodge”: a
collection of Masons who meet in a specific location, frequently a hall or building
dedicated to the purpose. Lodges are run by men known as “officers” who perform
specific administrative tasks that correspond roughly to those performed by the officers
of a business corporation. Lodges in turn are governed by administrative organizations
that Peachey Carnahan and Dan Dravot refer to as “Grand Lodge”. A Grand Lodge is an
administrative body that enforces uniform standards among the various lodges
throughout the region and grants or denies applications to open or close a Lodge. There
is also a Mother Grand Lodge in England that regulates the Grand Lodges in each part of
the world. This interconnection and correspondence between Lodges is very important,
because recognition by a Grand Lodge confers legitimacy. There are groups of people
who form “irregular” lodges that purport to be Masonic but that are not acknowledged
or recognized by the other Lodges due to serious departure from the traditions and
principles of Freemasonry. A “lodge” that is not recognized by a Grand Lodge or
particularly the Mother Grand Lodge is very likely to have something seriously wrong
with it. For this reason, Masons are required to not participate in Masonic activities with
outsiders or with “irregular” Masons from a lodge that is not recognized. Yet this is
exactly what Dan and Peachey do.
In Kipling’s fictionalized Kafiristan, Dan and Peachey find a collection of polytheistic
men who have radically different beliefs and priorities than their apron-wearing English
visitors. Their version of Freemasonry has mutated over the years into something more
like a religious cult. They were not given their degrees by any regular, recognized lodge,
and are therefore irregular Masons at best and outsiders at worst. Accordingly, when
Dan and Peachey participate in Masonic rituals with them, they are engaging in a
forbidden form of Masonic activity.
Dan identifies himself as a Grand-Master of the Craft and asserts that he will open a
Lodge in the Third Degree, to raise the local chiefs and priests to the Third Degree in
order to appropriate their authority and cement his own. Although a casual reader
might suspect that Dan might have some authority beyond the Third Degree, the text
shows he does not. Peachey asserts that neither he nor Dan has ever actually held office
in a Lodge. This means that Dan’s claims of being a “Grand-Master”, or his introduction
of himself and Peachey as “Past Grand-Masters” cannot possibly be true.
An “officer” is a man who has specific responsibilities within a Lodge, sometimes having
been elected by the other members of the Lodge. He is given enough authority to fulfil
those responsibilities. The most senior officer in a Lodge is the “Worshipful Master”, who
10/30/22, 1:09 PM Masonic Imagery in The Man Who Would Be King: [Essay Example], 3408 words GradesFixer
https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/masonic-imagery-in-the-man-who-would-be-king/ 4/7
is elected by the men in the Lodge. After his term of office expires, he becomes a “Past
Master” and in some cases may join the regional Grand Lodge. The head of the Grand
Lodge is the Grand-Master. The title “Past Grand-Master” exists in the York Rite, but is
not relevant to ordinary Freemasonry. During Dan’s first Lodge ceremony Peachey takes
the office of the “Senior Warden”, who is the Worshipful Master’s second-in-command.
There are several other offices through in which a Mason is expected to serve before he
is considered eligible to be a Senior Warden or Worshipful Master, and there are always
more opportunities for service than there are men willing to serve. Since both Dan and
Peachey can read but neither has ever held office in a lodge before, for the two of them
to take the most senior possible roles is quite arrogant.
Peachey is aware of the extent to which he and Dan are overreaching. He asserts that
opening a Lodge is “against all the law,” because he and Dan lack the necessary
experience and do not have an appropriate “warrant” from any Grand Lodge. Dan,
however, will not be denied. He commandeers the temple of Imbra, sets Peachey to
work making it look like a Masonic ritual space. Black and white checkerboard tiles are a
customary decoration, as are seats for particular officers and specially decorated aprons.
The Master Mason symbol on Dan’s apron matches a hidden symbol under a large stone
in the Temple of Imbra. The fact Dan knows and possesses the secret symbol causes the
Kafir men to believe that he and Peachey are not men who have reached a higher level
of advancement in the Craft, but gods. Since Daniel Dravot has been trying to pass
himself off as a god since he entered Kafiristan, he takes advantage of their credulity to
seize temporal power and expand his authority throughout the region.
The English adventurers give each of the Chiefs and priests English names, and do not
bother to learn their real ones. Billy Fish, for example, is a big chief in the first valley Dan
and Peachey conquer. But the fact Dan and Peachey are willing to raise Billy and the
other chiefs and priests to the Third Degree without knowing their real names is
ridiculous: almost as ridiculous as trying to lead a Lodge without being able to speak the
local language. Masonic rituals are always conducted in the language of the members of
the Lodge. After a couple months in the country, Dan understands some of the
language but does not speak fluently. Peachey never learns to speak to the Kafirs at all.
He does not have the communication skills to convey anything really important, such as
the obligations of the Master Mason.
Masonic Lodge ceremonies, including Degree rituals, have a large number of words in
them. There is a great deal of information that must be transferred to the man being
initiated to the First Degree, passed to the Second Degree, or raised to the Third Degree.
His obligations must be explained to him in the clearest possible terms. To conduct a
plausible Degree ritual takes a lot of memorization and practice. Although Dan and
Peachey have passed through the Third Degree and knows its symbols and forms of
recognition, they are also out of practice. Peachey admits that he has to “fudge” the
Ritual and make it up as he goes along despite the fact he is serving as Senior Warden (a
10/30/22, 1:09 PM Masonic Imagery in The Man Who Would Be King: [Essay Example], 3408 words GradesFixer
https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/masonic-imagery-in-the-man-who-would-be-king/ 5/7
name for a role within a Masonic ceremony). He and Dan get away with it chiefly
because the local priests are even more badly out of practice than they are. But the
overreach is almost ludicrous, especially when they fabricate a Third Degree ceremony
which Peachey admits is “not in any way according to Ritual” simply to raise ten of the
most important local chiefs and priests to the degree in order to consolidate their power
base.
The Masonic Order is what is known as a fraternal order. Part of the obligations
associated with Masonry include the duty to treat all other Masons as though they are
one’s brothers, and to render reasonable help in time of need, should the recipient
deserve it. This is one of the reasons Peachey, at the outset of the story, asks the narrator
for a favor “for the sake of your mother as well as mine”. Peachey suspects that the
narrator is a Mason, and that he therefore has a brotherly responsibility to him to at least
pass on his message to Dan at the railway station. This the narrator does, however his
brotherly responsibilities to Dan and Peachey do not extend to helping them blackmail
the head of a neighboring state. Just as biological brothers do not necessarily help each
other break the law or avoid consequences for bad behavior, a Freemason’s bonds of
fraternity do not override his religious, civic, or military responsibilities. Masonic brothers
are not obligated to aid each other in illegal activity: indeed, the very first line of the story
contains the phrase “if he deserve it”. The narrator understands the principle: once he
has performed the favor requested of him by delivering Peachey’s message to Dan, his
responsibility to the travelers ends. At no point does he believe that two vagabond con
artists (who happen to be Masons) deserve his cooperation or protection in the form of
silence while they embark upon their extortion scheme. Indeed, his responsibilities of
citizenship and basic decency compel him to send an advance warning so that Dan and
Peachey are intercepted at the border. In doing this, the narrator is acting on one of the
core Masonic principles, which is a respect for the law and authority in one’s own nation.
Although Dan and Peachey expect the narrator to help with, or at least overlook their
illegal shakedown scheme, the narrator feels no such obligation as a Mason.
Freemasons are not required to agree with each other or support one another blindly.
Within the Lodge, the custom of pax templi, or “peace of the temple” is observed: all
disputes, including legal battles and political differences, are left outside. Discussion of
controversial issues, particularly religion and politics, is forbidden. Because Masons can
be found throughout the world, including in countries where Lodges cannot formally
exist due to government suppression, it is not unusual for them to be on opposite sides
in a war. Outside the Lodge, Masons are expected to uphold the laws and military
responsibilities of their country, which may include knowingly fighting or killing another
Mason in battle should he be on the enemy side. Although Masonic culture includes a
sense of obligation to help people who are in need of aid including other Masons, should
they deserve it, the duty to render aid is always superseded by a man’s greater duties
such as the ones to his family, his nation, or his God. This is another area in which Dan
and Peachey blunder: their contract that they make with each other requires that each
10/30/22, 1:09 PM Masonic Imagery in The Man Who Would Be King: [Essay Example], 3408 words GradesFixer
https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/masonic-imagery-in-the-man-who-would-be-king/ 6/7
stand by the other if he is in trouble. When Dan’s megalomania sets off a riot and
outright rebellion once the villagers realize Dan is not in fact a god, and when Dan walks
around talking to himself instead of running for safety to Billy’s village, Peachey and Billy
then make a critical mistake by electing to stay with him. For this, the rioting tribesmen
kill Billy and crucify Peachey.
One of Daniel Dravot’s most fatal errors is to suppose that he has a bond of brotherhood
with the Kafir men that will protect him should they ever discover his deception.
Although the Kafir men observe some of the superficial behaviors associated with
Masonry, they do so as part of a ritualistic cult behavior, having blended Masonry with
their polytheistic religion. When Dan is revealed as having lied to them about being a
god, in Dan’s mind his lie is separate from his status as a Mason. The Kafirs make no
such distinction. Even if they have sworn the same oaths as Dan and Peachey, and taken
on the same obligations (which is not at all clear), once the Kafirs recognize Dan as an
impostor god they take him as an impostor through and through: if Dan was ever a
brother to them in the first place, he no longer is. This different style of reasoning is not
at all what Dan and Peachey expect. They expect the Kafirs to reason as Europeans
might, simply because they look European in their outward appearance, as opposed to
having an African, Asian, or Arab features. Yet the resemblance is entirely superficial.
One might be brother to a King, but can a human being ever be a brother to a god?
With the privileges of godhead, of course, come responsibilities and expectations that
no human being can meet. One of the things expected of Peachey and Dan is that they
know things only a god could know, including what gods should and shouldn’t be able
to do. Yet two men lack even normal Kafir knowledge about how their gods are
supposed to behave. They are unaware, for example, that there is a taboo against
intermarriage with humans and that they are supposed to be invulnerable to injury.
Peachey in particular feels his limitations, and is reminded of some “lost” knowledge of
the Master Mason: facts or mysteries related to the Third Degree that have either been
genuinely forgotten over the centuries or that never existed in the first place and that
are spoken of merely to illustrate the limits of human knowledge. But if Peachey tells the
truth—that the knowledge has been lost through no fault of his own—there is a very
good chance that their carefully constructed illusion of godhead will collapse.
At this point, it should be obvious that Dan and Peachey are violating Masonic rules and
traditions in many ways. They are also participating in Masonic rituals with irregular
“Masons”. They have founded a Lodge without a charter or authorization, and have taken
it upon themselves to raise men to the Third Degree without even knowing their real
names. Had they done these things simply to promote Freemasonry or to help the Kafir
men better themselves, their offenses might be excused. But they are not. They are
using the Craft to commit large-scale blasphemy for material gain. Since all Masons by
definition are theists and generally monotheists, and since one of a Freemason’s first
10/30/22, 1:09 PM Masonic Imagery in The Man Who Would Be King: [Essay Example], 3408 words GradesFixer
https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/masonic-imagery-in-the-man-who-would-be-king/ 7/7
duties is to his own God and religion, what Dan and Peachey are doing is inexcusable.
Thus, while The Man Who Would Be King is a rollicking adventure tale for many, it is also
a morality tale.
Sources
- Harris, R.V. The Meaning of Masonic Obligations. Designs Upon the Trestle Board, Vol.
2, pp. 71-77. 1984.
Retrieved from - http://www.masonicinfo.com/recognition.htm
- http://www.masonicinfo.com/fakemasonry.htm
- http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/masonicmuseum/glossary/glossary_index.htm
- http://phoenixmasonry.org/meaning_of_masonic_obligations.htm