There are those abusively and dangerously compulsively obsessed with “becoming my family mebers, being my pornography, and being on the trail of alledged wrondoing of mine.

“It was intententional! It was intention” or was it “It was strategic. It was Strategic” Barry Sheck argued to the Judge noting the Prosecution had made errors in its own favor.

Or were they errors? And what was the real state of mine of the person making the errors they made?

Patients with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) have been traditionally described as having a good insight into their symptoms; they perceive their obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms as excessive, unreasonable, and distressing.[1] The DSM IV field trial demonstrated that about a quarter of the patients were uncertain about whether their symptoms were unreasonable or excessive, indicating that a broad range of insight exists among patients with OCD.[2] It is now well-recognized that patients with OCD may present with varying degrees of insight, including poor and complete lack of insight into their OC symptoms.[2–4] Pathological beliefs appear to be placed along an ‘insight continuum’.[5] Through their ‘symptom component’ properties, they determine obsessions at one end, where beliefs are recognized as irrational. Overvalued ideas lie somewhere in the middle, and delusions where the beliefs are considered rational, lie at the other pole.[3] It can be a phenomenological challenge when the thin line of separation between these becomes difficult to discern. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3498784/

Nonpschotic compulsives have good insight into their acts. They may realize fully they are pursuing a compulsion they have, doing so with rational awareness and intent, yet still be compulsive.

This is what Radical Acceptance isn’t. I have talked about Stoic Epicurian beleifs of not being able to change certain things (thus accepting them) and instead changing what can be changed.

A video once was in the media of a monkey or gorilla of some type tying to carry around its deceased child not accepting or understanding its death.

The psychotics attacking me will not accept history nor that they are compulsively deeply insane.

I think they have killed, are in racketeering, and series of violent crimes, and aware of their illegal actions and illegal goals.

The have good insight into themselves, yet are comuslively insane nonetheless because they can not accept a truthfull world and will continue to try and create a world the dead chimp is alive in, even fight violently attempts to end the delusions it is deceased.

.Reproductively Hostile and Reproductvely Racketeered environments

18 U.S. Code § 1091 – Genocide

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev | next

(a)Basic Offense.—Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such—

(1)

kills members of that group;

(2)

causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;

(3)

causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;

(4)

subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;

(5)

imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or

(6)

transfers by force children of the group to another group;

shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

(b)Punishment for Basic Offense.—The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) is—

(1)

in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), where death results, by death or imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both; and

(2)

a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both, in any other case.

(c)Incitement Offense.—

Whoever directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(d)Attempt and Conspiracy.—

Any person who attempts or conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be punished in the same manner as a person who completes the offense.

(e)Jurisdiction.—There is jurisdiction over the offenses described in subsections (a), (c), and (d) if—

(1)

the offense is committed in whole or in part within the United States; or

(2)regardless of where the offense is committed, the alleged offender is—

(A)

a national of the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));

(B)

an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101));

(C)

a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States; or

(D)

present in the United States.

(f)Nonapplicability of Certain Limitations.—

Notwithstanding section 3282, in the case of an offense under this section, an indictment may be found, or information instituted, at any time without limitation.

(Added Pub. L. 100–606, § 2(a), Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3045; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60003(a)(13), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970; Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, § 4002(a)(4), (b)(7), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1806, 1808; Pub. L. 110–151, § 2, Dec. 21, 2007, 121 Stat. 1821; Pub. L. 111–122, § 3(a), Dec. 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 3481.)

https://ac25de3dfa72bd692ff241aaee8b4d9b.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-39/html/container.html