Decode this “intercept” from the CIA

ChatGPT Combined Textual Rendering

❖ Ed Donegan Substitution Guide

❝

• ➜Man About Town: Peter Lawford.

• ➜ Trustworthy Female: Marilyn Monroe close to all Kennedy family.

• ➜ Client Not Prospering At This Time Needs Advice: Sukarno. Needs advice on Economy and should come from Western expertise.

• ➜ FE Personnel: John Foster Dulles “FE personnel” almost certainly means Far East Division personnel—CIA officers assigned to the agency’s Far East Division.

• ➜ New York FE New York:Then Governor Rockefeller OR more likely Michael Clark Rockefeller (1938–1961), son of Nelson A. Rockefeller, who was governor of New York and later U.S. vice president.

• ➜ Los Angeles FE: Twombly? Donegan, Patricia Kennedy, Holt? Sam Gianca, ?

• ➜ Prominant Attorney Robert F. Kennedy

• ➜ Intermediary Howard Jones. Howard Palfrey Jones served as the United States ambassador to Indonesia from March 10, 1958, until May 24, 1965. He served during the Eisenhower, Kennedy, and early Johnson administrations and maintained a notably constructive relationship with President Sukarno.

• ➜ Letter Writer Sen John F. Kennedy Then US Foreign Policy Senate Committee

  ❞

Image 1

SECRET

EYES ONLY

SUBJECT: Project HARPSTAR

1. May 1958—FE Division initially contacted Director of Security and briefed him on Project. Basically, Project capitalized on President Sukarno’s weakness for women, especially Caucasian. Because of our inability to get controlled asset close to him to determine his thinking and plans, and the recent apparent success of Soviets’ use of a woman, believed he may let down guard and become expansive in discussion of plans with a female and accept advice that he would not ordinarily accept from a man.

2. Object—Locate intelligent, attractive, emotionally stable, and trustworthy female who would accept assignment which would involve eventual intimate relationship with Sukarno.

3. January 1958—Gave Robert Maheu assignment to locate candidate. He advised that a prominent [REDACTED] attorney and “man about town,” [REDACTED], could come up with a qualified woman. Maheu told [REDACTED] he had a “client” whose business was not prospering in an unidentified country. Felt could improve situation if an attractive and intelligent female could get to him and, through feminine charm, persuade his thinking in a more favorable direction.

4. [REDACTED] was investigated with favorable results and given CSA on [unclear] July 1958, but not made witting of CIA interest.

5. Candidate [REDACTED], a well-to-do widow, approximately 35 years old, resident of [REDACTED], considered highly intelligent and extremely attractive.

Image 2

SECRET

EYES ONLY

Page 3

14. [REDACTED] subsequently given several briefings by FE personnel, both in New York City and California. All under aliases. P.O. boxes and sterile phones were set up for communications.

15. Cover arrangements were completed by [REDACTED]. He arranged for [REDACTED] to carry a letter of introduction from [REDACTED], addressed to a [REDACTED], his representative in Indonesia. [REDACTED] known to Sukarno. Also arranged to have funds placed in the Indonesian branch of Twentieth Century Fox in DJAKARTA.

Transcription note: Blacked-out portions are rendered as [REDACTED]. One indistinct date is marked [unclear]. Apparent spelling, capitalization, and wording have otherwise been preserved as closely as the images permit.

1958 SubjectCIApRojectHarpstar.png SubjectCIApRojectHarpstar2.png 20th Centery Fox in Jakarta, The Von Trapps, Gov Rockefeller of New York, Robert Mahue of Los Angeles, Monroe will seduce Sukarno

The Man About Town arrived first, with the Prominent Attorney only a few steps behind him. Dr. Ralph Greenson joined them outside Cursum Perficio, Subject Used for Harpstar’s Brentwood home. The night had become unnaturally still, and the words set into the property—“Here ends the journey”—now seemed less like a decoration than a warning.

Greenson hurried inside while the other two men remained near the entrance, watching for movement along Fifth Helena Drive. Moments later, he returned with the stunned expression of someone who understood not only what had happened, but what their delay might mean. They had come intending to intervene, perhaps even to protect Subject Used for Harpstar, but they were too late.

“The Outfit got here first,” Greenson said. In Donegan’s imagined reconstruction, the words implicated the organization associated with Sam Giancana: a team capable of reaching Monroe before the Man About Town, the Prominent Attorney, and the psychiatrist could prevent the final act at Cursum Perficio. What are we going to tell Howard Jones aka Intermediary?

Yes, this suggests a more specific version of your theory—but the document supports some parts much more strongly than others.

The document establishes that Project HARPSTAR was carefully compartmentalized. The selected woman received briefings under aliases; post-office boxes and “sterile phones” were established; a letter of introduction and Indonesian business representatives were arranged; and funds were placed in the Jakarta branch of Twentieth Century Fox. That is a genuine and significant connection between a CIA operation against Sukarno and a major motion-picture company. It does not, by itself, show that Fox financed films for the CIA—the document identifies the Jakarta office as a financial or logistical cover mechanism.

Your proposed interpretation could be articulated this way:

Edward Paul Donegan theorizes that the biographical description of the unidentified HARPSTAR woman may have contained deliberate inaccuracies intended to provide plausible deniability. If a classified document were leaked or later released, a reader comparing its description with a suspected participant—Marilyn Monroe, for example—would encounter a supposedly disqualifying fact and conclude that the document referred to someone else. Under this theory, an erroneous detail would not necessarily be an ordinary mistake; it could function as a protective “exclusion marker,” concealing the subject even if the surrounding circumstances resembled her.

In this document, the candidate is described as:

• ➜ approximately 35 years old;

• ➜ a resident of a redacted location;

• ➜ a “well-to-do widow”;

• ➜ highly intelligent and extremely attractive.

In 1958, Monroe was 32 years old and divorced, not widowed. The age is approximate enough not to exclude her decisively, but “widow” plainly does. Your theory proposes that this could be the deliberately false exclusion marker.

There are, however, two competing explanations that must remain visible:

1. ➜ The description is substantially accurate and refers to a genuinely widowed woman other than Monroe.

2. ➜ The description was altered to conceal the woman’s identity, possibly even from some internal readers.

The document alone cannot decide between them. Redaction, aliases, sterile communications and commercial cover demonstrate an intention to conceal the operation, but they do not prove that CIA officers falsified “widow” specifically to conceal Monroe. Monroe’s participation would require independent evidence—travel arrangements, Maheu communications, a matching intermediary, financial records, witness testimony or an unredacted version identifying her.

The Twentieth Century Fox passage nevertheless adds an important documented fact to your larger media theory:

Donegan observes that HARPSTAR did not operate entirely outside the entertainment world. Its cover arrangements included placing funds in the Indonesian branch of Twentieth Century Fox. This establishes that, in at least this operation, CIA personnel were willing to use the overseas infrastructure of a motion-picture company for covert purposes. It does not establish CIA sponsorship of The Sound of Music or Rocky Horror, but it makes Donegan’s broader inquiry into connections among intelligence operations, motion-picture companies and political storytelling less abstract.

One further caution: the document appears to say the woman was “approximately 35 years old,” not exactly 35. Therefore, “widow” is the genuinely exclusionary detail, while the small age discrepancy is weak evidence either way. Complete National Archives document